Urban planners increasingly advocate mixed-use development because integrating residential, commercial, and recreational facilities reduces commuting distances and promotes environmental sustainability. Critics, however, argue that such developments may increase property prices and displace lower-income residents unless appropriate housing policies accompany urban expansion. The author would MOST likely agree that?
- Urban planning should balance development with social protection.
- Mixed-use development has only positive effects.
- Mixed-use development should always be avoided.
- None of these
Explanation
Urban planning should balance development with social protection.
The passage first gives benefits of mixed-use development: less commuting + environmental sustainability.
Then it gives the criticism: higher property prices and displacement of lower-income residents unless appropriate housing policies are in place.
So the author is presenting both sides and implies we need the benefits with policies to protect people.
Last verified on 21-08-2026
Related MCQs
- Industrial proliferation inherently engenders an irrevocable and non-negotiable environmental cataclysm.
- Anthropogenic activities are inconsequential to the homeostasis of global ecosystems.
- Expedient implementation of sustainable modalities can ameliorate environmental deterioration.
- Ecological degradation is exclusively attributable to natural geophysical phenomena.
اس سوال کو وضاحت کے ساتھ پڑھیں
- Foreign competition should be banned.
- Trade agreements always harm local industries.
- Trade agreements involve both benefits and challenges.
- None of these
اس سوال کو وضاحت کے ساتھ پڑھیں
- Urban planning should balance development with social protection.
- Mixed-use development has only positive effects.
- Mixed-use development should always be avoided.
- None of these
اس سوال کو وضاحت کے ساتھ پڑھیں
- Answer see in detail...
اس سوال کو وضاحت کے ساتھ پڑھیں
- Answer see in detail...
اس سوال کو وضاحت کے ساتھ پڑھیں
